The Village of Oak Park | 123 Madison St.  Oak Park, IL 60302 | village@oak-park.us

Main menu

STAY CONNECTED

2024 Budget Questions

Is there a consolidated view of the external support budget for the Village, across all departments, and how has that changed over the last five years?

Click here to view a spreadsheet detailing the departmental budgets for external support from 2020-24.

What is the staff headcount by department and the cumulative total over the last five years?

Click here to view the current FTE report from the 2024 budget.

Is there a correlation between external support and staffing?

The Finance Department cannot answer that question directly. Those decisions are made by the departments individually.

During the budget discussion last year (2022), the Village's year-end fund balance was estimated at $33 million. How did it end up at $38 million one month later?

Three million dollars in American Rescue Plan Act lost revenue was not taken into account in November 2022; real estate transfer taxes were $700,000 above estimate; natural gas tax was $300,000 above estimates; liquor tax was $150,000 above estimates and; state income tax was $200,000 above estimates.

It appears that health insurance costs have increased dramatically, double in some cases. Please provide additional context.

The budgeted health insurance costs for 2024 increased 8.8% from 2023. Other increases may be due to changes in which plan each employee enrolls in or an increase in vacant positions as these positions are budgeted at the highest cost option.

The proposed drawdown from reserves is approximately $5.8 million, of which $4.8 million is one-time fixed. Can you clarfiy how the remaining $1 million is being spent?

The additional $1 million is due to the timing of a number of capital projects that were budgeted for 2023, but some of the expense will not be paid for until 2024.

As of Nov. 15, 2023, the proposed appropriation from fund balance is $6,261,172. Of that amount, $5,861,831 is for one-time costs. The balance of $399,341 will be used for operating expenses.

As of Nov. 21, 2023 the proposed appropriation from fund balance is $6,055,985. Of that amount $5,754,344 is for one-time cost. The balance of $301,641 will be used for operating expenses.

The Village's investment income was $3.8 million per an earlier memo, but the budget indicates $1.75 million. Which is correct?

The $3.8 million in investment income is a projected number for 2023. The $1.75 million is the budgeted number for 2024 based upon conservative estimates that interest rates will not maintain their current level in 2024.

According to an attachment regarding partner agency spend (click here to view), Village staff is recommending an increased $352K, which is higher than the standard $300K Village spend, yet we have not received the audit results. We would have to amend our contract language if we are going to ignore the current requirement that OPRHC is in line with HUD’s certification.

The proposed 2024 budget reflects a placeholder of $352,500 for the Oak Park Regional Housing Center. Staff placed a placeholder in the same funding amount that the Housing Center received in fiscal year 2023. The Oak Park Regional Housing Center received an increase of 17.5% in funding for fiscal year 2023 because the Village was waiting for the conclusion of the Homes in Changing Region Housing Study to be completed to determine how the report affects the Housing Center’s scope of work. The housing study is still on track to be completed in 2024. The audit is scheduled to be completed by November 30. At the conclusion of the audit, Village Staff will receive a report from the auditors and make a recommendation to the Village Manager for the Oak Park Regional’s funding for fiscal year 2024.

As of Nov. 21, the Oak Park Regional Housing allocation was changed to $300,000.

In addition, the attachment includes a CDBG allotment ($75K) is higher than the amount recommended by the CDCAC ($60k) in June of this year. 

The CDBG funding of the Oak Park Regional Housing Center, the partner agency chart that is a part of the proposed 2024 budget, reflects a total of five (5) quarters of funding for the agency due to the CDBG program year being October 1-September 30. Village Staff estimate what the first quarter for the following program year will be based on the funding received for the current program year. This is done to ensure the agency has sufficient funds allocated in the calendar year fiscal budget.

What is the community cohort? What are the details of the digitization project?

Community cohort would be Leadership Lab though the Community Foundation. The digitization project will be digitizing all records which are only available in hard copy. For example, Board minutes, agendas, agreements, ordinances and resolutions. This will create efficiencies when responding to FOIA requests as well as transparency for the community.

Where are the outside counsel fees listed in the Law Department's budget? Given the department's hiring of an additional attorney, can you clarify how outsourced legal work can be decreased?

Outside counsel fees are listed as external support in the Law Department budget. If we were able to hire a new attorney, that attorney would not necessarily be ready to take on any substantial portion of the workload until fiscal year 2025. This is due to the time required for the recruitment and hiring process. In addition, the attorney would have to be onboarded, trained and become familiar with Village operations and legal processes. Thus, the new attorney is not initially intended to be an offset to  external support expenditures in the budget. If the intent is to offset external support, there would need to be a corresponding reduction in the workload. It is possible at some point that there could be an offset where the new attorney could handle certain matters that may be assigned to outside counsel, such as criminal prosecution and attendance at meetings and processing of matters coming before certain boards and commissions, such as the Plan Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission. The addition of the position is also design to be part of the Village’s succession planning model.

What is the reason behind the Law Department's self-insured fund increase of $500,000 and the contractual increase?

The increase in the self-insured retention fund is $261,354. This is due to increases in workers’ compensation costs and expected insurance premium costs.  

What are the details of the Human Resources Department's professional development program listed at $60,000?

Human Resources would like to develop a professional development/leadership academy. The goal is to identify future leaders and other high-potential employees and invest in their continued growth for the purpose of retaining, training and developing key skills and providing new or expanded experience. The purpose of this program is to create an eligible bench of employees who can step into more senior roles if/when staff retire or move on from the Village, ultimately reducing the risk and cost associated with anticipated or unanticipated turnover. We are in early stages with developing the program which may rely on a combination of external trainings and onsite internal resources. 

What is the context for the additional $23,200 for external support in the Adjudication Department?

Towing and Immobilaztion - Prior to the start of COVID-19, the budgeted line item for External Support (2020) was $186,100.  The proposed $23,200 increase brings the amount closer to the pre-COVID-19 level. $16,300 of the amount is budgeted in anticipation of additional hearings as a result of the resumption of immobilizations, Police initiatives such as the Roosevelt Road Tow Zone and other tow hearings. 
 
Mediations - Historically, Community Relations has provided mediation services for community disputes and used outside contractors. In 2024, some of the adjudicators will be available to serve as mediators in coordination with DEI/Community Relations. The $16,300 increase above includes anticipated adjudicator hours spent as mediators.
 
Youth Defense - $6,900 of the $23,200 increase is allocated for Youth Defense.  The Juvenile Adjudication process is civil in nature; however, the charged violations may have criminal implications.  Additionally, despite the best efforts of Adjudication staff and adjudicators to explain the rights of the youth and parents, there are limitations on the advice that can be provided. 

Can you provide an ARPA summary?

Click here to view a current ARPA spending and obligation summary. 
 
What changes have been made to the budget since the meeting on Oct. 26?
 
Click here to view a spreadsheet of budget changes. 
 
The Village is drawing down $500K to support operational needs. Why the deficit and how can we manage expenses to avoid that? This is over and above the $600K on crisis response which is also operational cost as it’s used to set up a new department. So, we are proposing $1.1 million in deficit funding in an environment where we are expecting $1.75 million in interest income. If that extra income did not exist, we’ll be $2.85 million in deficit per what is proposed. Is that correct?
 
This question will be discussed during the budget meeting on Nov. 28.
 
$250K for the compensation study seems high considering the Village is spending $100K for an economic vitality study. Please clarify.
 
The compensation study is in progress. The $250K is a placeholder for any potential adjustment as a result of that study.
 
Why have external support costs doubles since 2020?
 
Click here to view an external support spreadsheet detailing increase from 2020 Actual to 2024 Budget.
 
Is it correct that the Roosevelt Road study should be a result of the Village's economic vitality study and its overall economic development strategy?
 
As part of the 2024 Development Services Priorities presented to the Village Board on October 26th, department representatives communicated that the goal is to complete both the Economic Vitality study and the Roosevelt Road Corridor Plan in fiscal year 2024. The DS Economic Vitality Division will assist the Village Manager’s Office in the completion and facilitation of the Economic Vitality Study. The DS Planning & Urban Design Division will assist in the completion and facilitation of the new Roosevelt Road Corridor Plan. The Economic Vitality Study is the first priority. The Roosevelt Road Corridor Plan may take longer than one-year to complete, dependent upon the scope of review.  The Economic Vitality Study is completely separate and apart from the corridor study and they can move forward together at the same time without any diminishment of either effort.
 
The Roosevelt Road Corridor Plan is separate of the Economic Vitality Study. This study analyzes the specific conditions along the Roosevelt Road corridor that either assist with or hinder economic vitality in this corridor. The Corridor plan will identify specific goals for Roosevelt Road, in keeping with the communities’ desires, and will develop a series of recommended actions designed to meet specific objectives. These objectives may focus on commercial development, potential enhancement of public amenities to support economic vitality and, additionally, may focus on potential for property re-development within the corridor.  The study will solely focus on the Roosevelt Road Corridor.
 
The Economic Vitality Study will focus on the entire Oak Park business and development community and what can be done to not only expand economic vitality throughout the Village but to strengthen current programs, processes and activities related to economic vitality. Additionally, the study may analyze economic trends within Oak Park to help determine and support priorities related to successfully managing all aspects of private development in the Village. This study is broader than a more focused corridor plan.
 
The Village's fund balance is projected at 45%, which is over the recommended proportion of 25%. Why is it being kept so high when many areas of the budget could use additional funding?
 
There are a variety of expensive projects for which staff have been given direction to pursue that are not budgeted for over. For example, creating an on-going alternative calls for service program, lack of funds for future capital projects without ARPA (which starts next year), financing the new police station (depending on the financial analysis, you may need a significant down payment), lack of funds for a major renovation to Village Hall, the reparations conversation and the racial equity assessment haven’t even started with no dedicated funding source, the rising costs of police and fire pensions, the rising costs of employee healthcare, lack of funds for the climate action plan, possible deficits  in the parking fund and most recently funding the sheltering and future housing of migrants in Oak Park if needed. 
 
What are the suggestions on how to use $1-2 million for rebates for energy efficiency retrofites, heat pumps and solar panels?
 
This question will be discussed during the budget meeting on Nov. 28.
 
The police budget increased significantly even though the department is down in numbers of officers. What is contributing to this increase? As a result of the upheaval in summer 2020 the issue of public safety and police department budgets came under renewed scrutiny in Oak Park, as in other municipalities. Implementing the program on alternate response to mental health calls will be costly for a short time, but then should result in decreased costs as police officer time is diverted to other more urgent tasks.
 
The increase in the Police Department’s budget is largely due to salaries ($798,509), pension contributions ($846,927) and fringe benefits ($421,731) totaling $2,067,167.  The salary is based on the CBA and the Department being fully staffed.  Additionally, the Department reduced the civilian staff by one.  A total of $69,961 are for Contractual Services of $67,901 due to inflation as well as basic materials, supplies and equipment of $2,060.

---

(Last updated Nov. 28, 2023)